"Leibniz is probably better known to most people as a philosopher than a mathematician."
"No other thinker except Aristotle has rivaled him in the range and variety of his abilities and achievements."
"What manner of man was he, and how did he live, and what did he think?"
"As with most men of really great intellect, Leibniz's formal education was only a minor eddy in the torrent of thought and study and learning that was the essence of his life."
How is it possible to absorb "all the knowledge of his time"? Was there really not that much knowledge going around back in the 17th century?
Was this not the time of being accused of heresy over even the slightest tampering with religion? How did the church approve of his ideas on Christianity and Protestant views?
The fact that an 8-year-old learned Latin and German on his own makes me feel inadequate as a person. Actually, the fact that Leibniz just kept learning from birth to death makes me feel inadequate as a person.
I guess it makes sense that in that day and age a man who knew little of math would be disregarded as a thinker simply because math was such a huge thing back then. Knowing a lot about everything but math would probably only amount to 65% of the total knowledge on the planet at that time.
Leibniz really was a man of many, many, many talents. Not only that, he was good at pretty much everything he did.
I think it's funny that there's a huge "Leibniz vs. Netwon" rivalry. It's like the "band vs. band" or "overly large UFC fighter vs. overly large UFC fighter" rivalries of today. Strange how interests have changed so drastically from the 17th century.
No comments:
Post a Comment